Babylon engraving The Confusion of Tongues by Gustave Doré (1865) Dubai a Case for Mystery Babylon. Dubai a city in the desert by the sea. Revelation 17, 18, & 19:1-3. Registration starts 90 days before the session start date Spring League - starts every January Summer League - starts in May/June Fall League - starts every September. The Rise And Fall Of Babylon. Early History Of Babylon. The early history of Babylon is shrouded in mystery. By Walid Shoebat. When it comes to Mystery Babylon, the common tendency amongst many Protestant theologians is to liken it to Rome. According to them, Rome is the. The Fall of Babylon Versus The Destruction of Babylon Chuck Missler Nebuchadnezzar's Successors Nebuchadnezzar's death was followed by a steady weakening of the regime. The Battle of Opis, fought in September 539 BC, was a major engagement between the armies of Persia under Cyrus the Great and the Neo-Babylonian Empire under. Does the ancient Babylon ever existed? The only record could be found is in the Bible. Critics used the story of Babylon, and what they called its non-historic kings. Throughout the Holidays, Babylon Falls Church will operate on a first-come/first-serve basis for evening events. You may still call the restaurant or evening managers. The Fall Of Babylon Writings On The Walls![]() Early History Of Babylon. The early history of Babylon is shrouded in mystery. First mentioned in the Bible is the record of Genesis 10:8-10 which names Nimrod, the. Babylon. Capital of the Neo-Babylon Empire of the mid-first millennium b.c. Babylon has both a historic role and a theological role in the Bible. 2017 Babylon Village Chamber of Commerce Sponsored Events ***** March. 3/30/17 6:30 PM Chinese Auction @ The American Legion Hall 22. First mentioned in the Bible is the record of Genesis 1. Nimrod, the grandson of Ham, as the founder of the city in the dim prehistoric past. Its name was derived from a later experience revealed in Genesis 1. Shinar, the southern portion of Mesopotamia, are recorded as building a tower designed to reach the heavens. This may have been the beginning of a practice of building towers with religious significance. Such a tower is known as a ziggurat, designating an artificial mound of brick and soil elevated above the surrounding terrain. The Biblical description of the tower is in keeping with the characteristics of the area. Lacking stones, they made brick and used slime or bitumen native to the area in the construction of the tower. According to Scripture, the inhabitants had said,Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth (Genesis 1. The Scriptures record that the Lord judged the people and confounded their language with the result that the city and the tower were left unfinished (Genesis 1. The place according to Genesis 1. Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.” It seems probable that the name given to the city in Genesis 1. Babylon as a center of religious significance, and as a source of false religion and rebellion against the true God. Although the city of Babylon does not rise to prominence until 1. Babylonia, had a long history. Early civilization near the site of ancient Ur in lower Babylonia dates from the fourth millennium b. The period of the early dynasties (2. The old Akkadian period (2. Sargon from Persia to the Mediterranean. This was followed by the Neo- Sumerian period (2. Abraham was born. The land was sacked by the Elamites and Amorites in the period 1. The history of Babylonia proper, known as the Old Babylonia period (1. Hammurabi (1. 72. Code was discovered in 1. Babylonia was next invaded by the Kassites in the period 1. This was followed by Dynasty II of Isin (1. Babylonians. In the period from 1. Assyria. In 7. 29 b. Tiglath- pileser became king of Babylon and later in 6. Sennacherib, Babylon was destroyed by fire. It was rebuilt by Esarhaddon, and was finally wrested from Assyria around 6. Neo- Babylonian Empire was founded by Nabopolassar, the father of Nebuchadnezzar. With the help of the Medes, Nineveh was destroyed in 6. Necho of Egypt was defeated in 6. The stage was now set for the brilliant reign of Nebuchadnezzar which included the earlier conquering of Jerusalem in 6. The Prophecies Of Isaiah Concerning Babylon. Apart from a reference to a “Babylonish garment” in Joshua 7: 2. Biblical reference to Babylon after Genesis 1. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel unfolded God’s plan for the ancient city. Most of the Biblical prophecies relating to Babylon are in relation to the captivity and God’s revelation to Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel concerning the ultimate end of the captivity both for Israel and for Babylon. Most remarkable, however, are the prophecies of Isaiah delivered a century before Babylon had risen to power and recorded at a time when Babylon was still in obscurity with no indication of its coming greatness. Outstanding chapters in Isaiah’s predictions are 1. The predictions of Isaiah have to do with Babylon’s ultimate destruction in the Day of the Lord. The near and the far view are often mingled as in chapter 1. The destruction of Babylon is pictured in Isaiah 1. God’s program to punish the entire world (cp. The historic conquering of Babylon by the Medes and the Persians is mentioned specifically in Isaiah 1. Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, which shall not regard silver; and as for gold, they shall not delight in it. Their bows also shall dash the young men to pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eye shall not spare children. And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. The prophet seems to refer to the far view, that is, the destruction of Babylon in relation to the second coming of Christ in 1. Here it is declared: It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there. But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there. And the wild beasts of the islands shall cry in their desolate houses, and dragons in their pleasant palaces: and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged. As far as the historic fulfillment is concerned, it is obvious from both Scripture and history that these verses have not been literally fulfilled. The city of Babylon continued to flourish after the Medes conquered it, and though its glory dwindled, especially after the control of the Medes and Persians ended in 3. Interpretation has been made more difficult by the varied meanings of Babylon itself. Sometimes the term (in the Hebrew Babel) refers to the city whose history continued and was flourishing even during the Apostolic period when it became a center of Jewish learning after the destruction of Jerusalem. Sometimes the term is used in reference to the political power of Babylon which obviously fell in one night when the Medes and the Persians took control of Babylon. Sometimes it is used in a religious sense, for Babylon has been the fountain of many of the pagan religions which have competed with Judaism and Christian faith ever since. The interpretation of Isaiah 1. Revelation 1. 7, 1. Many interpreters agree that Babylon in its religious and political sense will be revived at the end of the age. Debated is the conclusion that the city itself will have a physical revival to become the capital of the world at the end of the age. Such a rebuilding of the ancient city would make possible a literal fulfillment of the prophecy of complete and sudden destruction as predicted in Isaiah 1. Isaiah 1. 4 seems to confirm that the ultimate destruction in view is one related to the second advent of Christ and the Day of the Lord. The satanic power behind Babylon addressed as “Lucifer, son of the morning” (1. God and in his ultimate judgment. The destruction of Babylon is related to the judgment upon “all the kings of the nations” (1. Another massive prophecy against Babylon is found in Isaiah 4. Here a prediction of Babylon’s utter humiliation is given, and the foreview seems to relate primarily to the capture of Babylon by the Medes and the Persians. The sad pronouncement is made at the conclusion of the passage, “None shall save thee” (Isaiah 4. The major attention given to Babylon in Isaiah’s prophecies confirm Babylon’s importance in prophecy relating to the nations. The Prophecies Of Jeremiah Concerning Babylon. The prophet Jeremiah like Isaiah devotes two long chapters to the prediction of Babylon’s ultimate judgment and destruction (Jeremiah 5. If the prophecies of Isaiah are remarkable for their anticpation of Babylon’s rise to power and the captivity of Judah a hundred years before it actually occurred, the prophecies of Jeremiah are notable because they were delivered at the peak of Babylon’s power when it seemed most unlikely that the great nation would fall. Babylon is pictured as being punished because of its cruel treatment of Israel (5. Practically all of the predictions of Jeremiah seem to relate to the fall of Babylon by the attack of the Medes and the Persians. Only occasionally does there seem to be a reference to a future ultimate destruction as in Jeremiah 5. The prophecies of Jeremiah predicting the fall of Babylon at the hands of the Medes and the Persians were graphically fulfilled approximately sixty- five years later, as recorded in Daniel 5. Major attention is devoted to the captivity of Judah in the prophecies of both Jeremiah and Ezekiel. There is almost constant reference to the Babylonian captivity of Judah in Jeremiah beginning in chapter 2. Ezekiel. Much of Jeremiah’s ministry was to his own generation as he predicted the downfall of Jerusalem and the victory of the Babylonian armies. Jeremiah is seen as the true prophet of God in contrast to the false prophets who had predicted victory over Babylon (cp. Jeremiah 2. 8: 1- 1. Jeremiah’s prophecies were largely ignored. The first copy of his book was destroyed by the king (3. Jeremiah himself suffered affliction and imprisonment (3. With the capture of Jerusalem, the prophecies of Jeremiah were fully vindicated. Most important were Jeremiah’s prophecies concerning the duration of the captivity, designated as seventy years in Jeremiah 2. It was this prophecy which was read by Daniel which led to his prayer for the return of the captives to Jerusalem (Daniel 9: 2). A prominent theme of Jeremiah’s prophecies were predictions against Egypt in which he anticipated that Nebuchadnezzar would conquer Egypt. As a traditional enemy of Israel, Egypt was thus to experience God’s judgment in the form of coming under the power of Babylon. Jeremiah devotes considerable Scripture to this theme, including 4. In chapter 4. 4 Jeremiah sends a message to the Jews in Egypt in which he predicts that their attempt to escape the power of Babylon would only result in their own destruction. The Prophecies Of Ezekiel Concerning Babylon. Ezekiel echoes the prophecies of Jeremiah relating to the Babylonian captivity (Ezekiel 1. Jeremiah predicts the conquering of Egypt (2. Added is the prediction of the destruction of Tyre in Ezekiel 2. The Fall of Babylon: A Problem In Prophetic Interpretation. The. of Babylon: AProblem. Prophetic Interpretation. James E. Smith. Professor of Old Testament. Florida Christian College. Volume. XVII - - Number 1. Fall, 1. 97. 0pp. C)opyright 1. 97. All Rights Reserved. The Cincinnati Bible College &. Seminary IN comparison with their treatment. Isaiah and Jeremiah had a great deal to say about. Babylon. 1. As regards the fulfillment of these prophecies two schools of thought have. One view is that ancient Babylon will be restored, become once. This view might be called the futuristic view. Another view. is that Babylon was destroyed once and for all and will never be restored. This might be designated as the historical view. The purpose of this article. Is the fall of Babylon as prophesied by Isaiah. Jeremiah an historical event of the past, or does it await a future. There are far- reaching involvements. The ultimate. issue underlying this whole discussion is: How literally are Old Testament. Some insight into this basic hermeneutical. Babylon. THE FUTURISTIC VIEW OF BABYLON'S. FALL The view that the destruction. Babylon is yet future is defended by Newton,2. Pember,3 Seiss,4. Newell,5 and others. Five lines of argument are offered in support of this. The Argument from Eschatology It is the contention of the. Babylon. is directly related to an eschatological setting. Certain passages relate. Babylon to the Day of the Lord and to the Millennial Kingdom. Babylon's fall and the. Day of the Lord. The futuristic interpreters insist that Isaiah. Babylon as. the Day of the Lord. To these interpreters the Day of the Lord is always. Since in Isaiah 1. Day of. the Lord" appears these verses must have a future fulfillment. But if these. verses have a future fulfillment then it would seem to be impossible to. Babylon. as having been fulfilled in the past. The. conclusion is therefore offered that since the fall of Babylon as prophesied. Scripture is to take place in the setting of the Day of the Lord; and. Day of the Lord is yet future, then it follows that the destruction. Babylon yet awaits fulfillment. Babylon's fall and the Millennial. Kingdom. The futuristic interpreters point out that the prophecy. Babylon's fall not only relates to the Day of the Lord but also to the. Millennium. The passage which most. Isaiah 1. 4: 1- 7. James Gray argues that there are at least three things in these verses. Israel's history which have not come to pass: (1) God has not yet set them in their. Israel does not yet possess the peoples of. Israel has not yet taken them captive whose. It is asserted that those who regard the fall of. Babylon as historically complete must spiritualize these verses or pass. The futuristic interpreters categorically reject. Israel. 9 Thus Scripture makes Babylon's. Israel. and the coming Day of the Lord. Even if it could be shown that the desolation. Babylon and its land has reached a point which adequately answers to. Scripture respecting it, a revival of Babylon would still. Scripture to be accomplished. Newton summarizes. Babylon can only be finally destroyed at the. Scriptures."1. 0The Argument from History A second line of argument used. Babylon's fall is the argument from history. It is affirmed that the record of history and the prediction of Scripture. Babylon is an event of. Scriptural prophecy is alleged to contradict the historical record. Babylon's fall.(2) the catastrophic nature of Babylon's fall. The suddenness of Babylon's. The futuristic interpreters. Scriptures indicate a sudden destruction of Babylon whereas. Isaiah 4. 7, for example, indicates that the "mistress of kingdoms". Both the loss of. Babylon suddenly and completely ("in their full measure"). But the. continuous history of Babylon can be traced through many centuries subsequent. Cyrus. This fact seems to contradict the. Babylon's fall as given by Isaiah 4. Furthermore. Babylon will be destroyed "as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah" (1. The destruction of these cities was not protracted through many centuries. So Babylon's destruction is. The heavens and earth will become disordered and water. Isaiah 1. 3: 1. 3, Jeremiah. Because. Babylon did not suddenly become a desolation, the futuristic interpreters. The catastrophic nature. Babylon's fall. The catastrophic nature of Babylon's fall is. Every one that is found shall be thrust. Their infants. also shall be dashed in pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be. Isaiah 1. 3: 1. 5- 1. The language of these two verses. Babylon. The argument is advanced. Babylon's downfall did a destruction of. A second passage indicates. Come against her from the utmost border. Jeremiah 5. 0: 2. This verse probably means that all the property found. Babylon would be collected and then burnt with the city. But such a. catastrophic destruction has not been literally fulfilled by any of Babylon's. From the futuristic view point. Babylon have not been fulfilled. History reveals that Babylon never. In view of this argument from history Newell concludes "it appears impossible. Babylon's final overthrow. The Argument from the Present The third line of evidence. Babylon's fall is the argument from. It is affirmed that many passages which refer to Babylon's. The following excerpts from the Babylon prophecies make clear. Babylon should be if the prophecies have been. It shall never be. Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall shepherds make. For out of the north cometh a nation against. And they shall not take. Lord (Isaiah. 1. 3: 2. Jeremiah 5. 0: 3: 5. The futuristic interpreters do. Babylon corresponds. To be sure Babylon has experienced. But thus far only "premonitory blows" have. Babylon. 1. 7. Seiss maintains that "Babylon, in all the deep calamities and desolations. In contradiction to the prophecies. Babylon flourishing villages exist today. One city of more than ten thousand population. Larkin argues that it has never been true that "neither shall the Arabian. Isaiah 1. 3: 2. 0). Nor can it be said "and they shall not. Jeremiah. 5. 1: 2. Babylon. Hillah was entirely constructcd from debris of the city, and even in the. Bagdad Babylonian- stamped brick may be frequently noticed. Newton emphasizes the fact that the LAND of Babylon has never yet experienced. LAND of Babylon. 2. The futuristic interpreters. Babylon have not. This being the case, they argue, three alternatives. Babylon. has not yet received its final blow. Whether or not this exhausts the possible alternatives. Babylon's fall. is heard. The Argument from Revelation 1. A more positive argument supporting. Revelation 1. 7- 1. It is important. to note that most of those who hold that Babylon is yet to be destroyed. Revelation 1. 7- 1. The argument is that two Babylons are described in the Book of Revelation. Babylon and literal Babylon. Literal Babylon will be restored. The two Babylons of Revelation. The key point in the argument from the Book of Revelation is that John. Babylons. In Revelation 1. John speaks of a "woman" called. Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of. Earth." In chapter 1. John speaks of a city called "Babylon the Great.". Pember argues that the "woman" and the "city" cannot symbolize the same. The. ''woman'' is destroyed by the "ten kings," (1. God in the form of a fire and earthquake. Furthermore, the first verse. Newell adds the following distinction: The particular sin of Babylon in. Spiritual fornication; of Babylon in chapter 1. By such lines of argument the conclusion is reached that the "woman" and. Pember states that "whatever may be. Babylon of the seventeenth chapter, it is, at least, something. These interpreters make a distinction between "Mystic Babylon" and "Literal. Babylon" (Newell); "Ecclesiastical Babylon" and "Eschatological Babylon". Bloomfield) ; "Mystical Babylon"and "Commercial Babylon" (Larkin). Mystical. Babylon is the Devil's church through the ages; commercial Babylon is the. Euphrates restored. The restoration of literal. Babylon. According to the futuristic school, Revelation 1. Babylon of the last days. In Chapter 1. 7 John dealt chiefly. According to this view. Govett insists that this means the chapter must be taken literally. Larkin contends that since symbolical Babylon was destroyed in chapter. Babylon. Since no such city exists. Babylon must be rebuilt at some point in the future. The last world- monarchy, with Antichrist at its head will make the restored. God- defying. nations of the earth. The final destruction of Babylon. According to the futuristic interpreters. Revelation 1. 8 also describes the overthrow of the future metropolis of. Babylon. The chapter begins with the angelic announcement of doom. Fallen, Fallen is Babylon the great." God's people (in this case, godly. Jews) are warned to flee out of Babylon. The direct and catastrophic nature of Babylon's final fall is indicated. Babylon's destruction will come in "one hour" (v. The city will be destroyed by. Isaiah 1. 3: 1. 9 "As when God overthrew. Sodom and Gomorrah." The awful, perpetual curse of desolation that will. The. kings and merchants oft he earth mourn over the destruction of the great. Little harmony exists among. Babylon. Seiss believes. Babylon is so miraculous and direct. Govett believes the judgment will be executed by Israel just before that. God. 3. 2. Bloomfield, on the other hand, feels that the city will be destroyed by. Anti- christ probably by means of an atomic bomb. Such then is the argument from. Book of Revelation. After the fall of ecclesiastical Babylon, literal. Babylon will be rebuilt, will become a great commercial center, and will. The Argument from Zechariah's Vision Another line of positive testimony. Zechariah's. vision of the woman in an ephah (5: 5- 1. The prophet sees a woman called. Shinar by two winged women. According to Bloomfield the woman symbolizes. Satan's church. 3. This prophecy was delivered subsequent to Babylon's captivity and at least. Babylon had been conquered by the Medes and Persians. Newell supposes this vision to portray the final concentration of wickedness. Babylon in the land of Shinar.
0 Comentarios
Deja una respuesta. |
AutorEscribe algo sobre ti mismo. No hay que ser elegante, sólo haz un resumen. Archivos
Marzo 2019
Categorías |